Genre blending has a reputation for being either magical or reckless, depending on who you ask.
- William Hopson
- 2 hours ago
- 3 min read
Some people treat it like alchemy — throw disparate elements together and hope something interesting happens. Others see it as cultural trespassing. In practice, it is neither. It is research. And this week’s experiment — building a Bollywood-style dance track entirely on an iPad — made that clearer than ever.

This was not a genre I grew up with, study formally, or even listen to casually. The request came from my wife, the intended audience was my daughter’s dance routine, and the constraint was the same as always: do it with a lightweight mobile setup. That combination removes the option of faking it with sheer production horsepower. If the musical DNA is wrong, no amount of polish will hide it. So instead of guessing, I approached the problem the way I approach unfamiliar territory in my day job — like legal research.
The first step was essentially musical stare decisis. In law, precedent matters because patterns of reasoning accumulate authority over time. In music, popular examples serve a similar function. I listened to a range of modern Bollywood dance tracks, not for enjoyment but for evidence. What elements kept appearing regardless of artist or production style? What felt essential versus ornamental? After enough exposure, common threads emerged: aggressive, layered percussion; dramatic builds; bright, high-contrast orchestration; and melodies that moved differently than typical Western pop lines.
Only after identifying those recurring features did I move on to secondary sources — articles, breakdowns, musician forums, and educational material explaining instruments like dhol and tabla, as well as the role of raga-based thinking in melodic construction. I was not trying to become an expert in Indian classical music. That would take years. The goal was narrower and more practical: understand the non-negotiables. Every style has them. Remove those, and the result stops sounding like the genre at all.
Once the core requirements were clear, the project shifted from research to translation. How do you recreate the function of traditional instruments using tools that live inside a tablet? How do you capture the feel of a musical system built on different assumptions about rhythm and melody while still working inside a grid-based DAW? This is where constraint becomes useful rather than limiting. You are not reproducing a tradition; you are approximating its structural logic with the tools you have.
On the iPad, that meant building dense percussion layers first, because rhythm carries much of the stylistic identity. It meant choosing sounds that suggested acoustic instruments even when they were synthetic. It meant favoring stepwise melodic motion and ornamentation over the wide interval leaps common in Western pop writing. None of this required exotic software or expensive add-ons. It required understanding what job each musical element was supposed to perform.
There is a temptation to believe authenticity comes from using the “correct” tools. In reality, authenticity in genre blending comes from respecting the underlying rules. If you know why something sounds the way it does, you can often achieve a convincing result with completely different means. Conversely, you can use all the authentic instruments in the world and still produce something that feels wrong if the structure is off.
The final step was the easiest: do the basics my way. Once you know the boundaries, creativity becomes a matter of navigation rather than invention. The arrangement, the sound design choices, the workflow — those were familiar territory. The difference was simply that they were operating within a newly mapped landscape. The result is not a traditional Bollywood track, nor is it pretending to be one. It is a functional fusion piece that satisfies the expectations of the style while remaining true to the production approach that defines this project.
This process highlights something important about genre blending more broadly. It is not about diluting styles into a bland average. It is about identifying structural compatibilities and points of tension, then designing around them. Good fusion sounds intentional because it is intentional. It acknowledges lineage without being trapped by it.
For creators working with limited setups — whether that means an iPad, a laptop, or a bedroom studio — this approach is liberating. You do not need encyclopedic knowledge of every musical tradition to explore outside your comfort zone. You need a method. Listen for patterns. Identify essentials. Understand function. Then execute with the tools you actually have.
In other words, treat unfamiliar music the way a careful professional treats unfamiliar law: respectfully, systematically, and with an eye toward precedent.
Genre blending is not guesswork. It is applied research with a creative output.
And occasionally, the client is a six-year-old with a dance routine and very firm expectations.



Comments